[Author‘s Note: If you have clicked on this link, then you are probably a big ol’ nerd. I LIKE YOU ALREADY!]
Why should I care about “redistricting”?
Well, if you have opinions about ANYTHING, then you probably want to choose who makes the laws that affect your life.
Don’t voters choose their representatives now?
You would think so, wouldn’t you? The truth, however, is that in North Carolina a high-priced private consultant used sophisticated software to design a system by which the party who hired him can control the legislature with the support of less than a majority of voters.
The tool that they use to create the illusion that they enjoy majority support is commonly known as gerrymandering. The result is an oligarchy disguised as a representative democracy. The party drawing the map can design the districts so that their party will almost always win, even if fewer people vote for them. WANT TO KNOW MORE?
If the answer is “yes”, then you are in the right place. This is a list of links and references so that when my nerdy friends bug me about wanting to know more about redistricting, I can just send them this link. YOU’RE WELCOME, my nerdy peeps.
What is this “redistricting” of which you speak?
Every 10 years, congressional districts are redrawn in connection with the US Census. In North Carolina, the North Carolina General Assembly (NCGA) also draws its State Senate and State House districts at the same time.
The process for drawing districts varies from state to state – almost half of the states have some sort of redistricting commission, while in others the districts are drawn by the state legislature and subject to veto by the governor. North Carolina is one of a handful of states in which the state legislature solely controls redistricting – the district maps are not subject to the governor’s veto and there is no redistricting commission. But enough about that – YOU ARE HERE FOR THE LINKS, RIGHT?
– ALL THE LINKZZZZZZ –
Check out this great Redistricting Blog by Loyola Law School professor Justin Levitt for a great overview of redistricting, as well as blog posts about current issues.
The Brennan Center for Justice section on redistricting has a great overview, and all the latest information on ongoing legal cases (plus links to key filings).
The Brennan Center March 2017 State of Redistricting Cases is here: http://www.brennancenter.org/blog/state-redistricting-litigation-march-2017-edition
The “Citizen’s Guide to Redistricting” put out by the Brennan Center for Justice has a good overview of redistricting; however, note that it is from 2010 and the sections on the Voting Rights Act are no longer accurate because of more recent court cases.
Amaze your friends! Use terms from this Redistricting Glossary: http://www.fairvote.org/redistricting#redistricting_glossary
This Election Law blog by Election Law Professor Rick Hasen covers all voting rights issues, including redistricting – sign up for the email news letter and impress your friends by being the first to hear about exciting developments!
Redistricting reform is the new “sexy” – even Teen Vogue is writing (surprising good) articles like “Everything you Need to Know about Gerrymandering“.
You can find links to the NC maps, and other related information on the NC Legislature website.
For a great overview of the history of redistricting in North Carolina and applicable law, read this illuminating law review article, “Race as a Tool in the Struggle for Political Mastery: North Carolina’s ‘Redemption’ Revisited 1870-1905 and 2011-2013“. It is really good.
For more on the out-of-state private consultant sent to North Carolina by an outside think tank who drew the 2011 maps and who has cost North Carolina taxpayers $$MILLIONS of dollars defending the gerrymandered districts in court, see The Atlantic’s “The League of Dangerous Mapmakers” and David Daley’s book “Ratf**ked”.
The Constitution Project has a nice short film on the “One Person, One Vote” reapportionment standard, starting with Baker v. Carr in 1962 and Reynolds v. Sims in 1964 : http://www.theconstitutionproject.com/portfolio/one-person-one-vote/
Want to talk to your friends about redistricting, but you also still want to have friends? Read this Messaging Manuel on talking to people about redistricting.
For my summaries on Covington and Harris and the story behind them, see https://hyperblogic.org/2017/02/13/how-many-lawsuits-does-it-take/
But what do you REALLY want?
Yeah, you know what I am talking about: a test for PARTISAN GERRYMANDERING.
While the US Supreme Court has recognized that extreme gerrymandering by political parties for their own benefit is unconstitutional, it has not previously ruled on a test for partisan gerrymandering. A new group of cases, including the Common Cause / League of Women Voters of North Carolina case, are challenging partisan gerrymandering as impermissible under the US Constitution.
The arguments made in the consolidated LWV/ CC case are summarized in this US District Court’s Memorandum. Specifically, they argue that “the Plan violates three constitutional provisions:
- The Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, by diluting the electoral strength of individuals who voted against Republican candidates,
- The First Amendment, by burdening and retaliating against individuals who voted against Republican candidates on the basis of their political beliefs and association,
- Article I, Section 2, which provides that members of the House of Representatives will be chosen “by the People of the several States,” by usurping the right of the voters to select their preferred candidates for Congress.” (citations omitted).
A test for Partisan Gerrymandering: Whitford v. Gill
In light of these NC cases, it is worth noting the Wisconsin partisan gerrymandering case, Whitford v. Gill, which has been appealed to SCOTUS. In Whitford, a three judge panel ruled that Wisconsin’s districts were unconstitutional based because of PARTISAN gerrymandering, stating the “First Amendment and the Equal Protection Clause protect a citizen against state discrimination as to the weight of his or her vote when that discrimination is based on the political preferences of the voter.”
Whitford uses a three-part test that asks: “1) whether the map had discriminatory intent; 2) whether the map had a discriminatory effect; and 3) if there were no other legitimate reason, like the natural political geography of the state, that justified the way the maps were drawn.”
Meet the man who may end gerrymandering: Bill Whitford, the plaintiff in Whitford v. Gill in this article by my BFF and the author of “Ratf**ked“, David Daley (ok, he is not really my BFF, but I did sit next to him at a redistricting conference once.): http://www.salon.com/2017/03/26/meet-the-man-who-may-end-gerrymandering-a-retired-wisconsin-law-professors-supreme-court-case-could-save-democracy/
Still not enough? You can read more about Whitford from the Campaign Legal Center , you saucy devil.
Did you know? Other states have had constitutional amendments on redistricting. One example is the Fair Districts Amendment: “Legislative districts or districting plans shall not intentionally or unduly favor or disfavor any political party. Within twelve months of ratification, all federal and state district lines shall be redrawn to conform hereto.” https://fixitamerica.org/help-us-pass-the-amendment
Check out Virginia’s effort for redistricting reform: OneVirginia2012
What Rhymes with “Gerrymander”?
Not much. But if you need a chant for a #FairDistricts rally, you can try one of the following (hat tip to Jennifer Bremer, who I suspect is actually a Time Lord as she is absolutely everywhere and can do everything):
“1) Gerry, gerry-man-der-ing, GOP philan-der-ing;
2) Gerrymanders rob our voice, give the voters back our choice;
3) Why is our state gerrymandered, we demand a higher standard;
4) Gerrymanders segregate, we demand a fairer state;
5) Rucho, Lewis, Berger, Moore, gerrymanders out the door.”
BUT WAIT! I want to have even more fun with redistricting!
Check out these printable signs, and decide what YOU think NC’s districts look like.
Are you into double-dutch? instead of using that old “Cinderella” rhyme, try this next time you jump rope: